Thursday, May 22, 2025
spot_img
HomeBlogsFitna-e-Hindustan: A Terminology or Strategic Narrative?

Fitna-e-Hindustan: A Terminology or Strategic Narrative?

In a significant move, the state has officially designated all Baloch separatist militant outfits as part of “Fitna-e-Hindustan” (The Mischief of India). this term reflecting the state’s stance that these groups are not indigenous freedom fighters, but proxies allegedly funded and directed by hostile foreign elements, particularly Indian intelligence agencies.

This terminology shift is more than symbolic. It reflects Pakistan’s broader narrative strategy in the face of rising cross-border terrorism and internal insurgencies that are believed to be externally supported.

It also draws a clear ideological line between Baloch cultural identity — which is rich, diverse, and proudly Pakistani — and the violent separatist movements that have repeatedly targeted civilians, military convoys, and critical infrastructure.

The decision is taken after multiple strikes in Blochistan by Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) , Baloch Liberation Federation (BLF), Baloch Republic Army (BRA), BLUF and Others. Specially after recent strikes on school bus in Balochistan area of Khuzdar where 4 students and 2 other personnel’s martyred .

Why the Term “Fitna-e-Hindustan”?

In Islamic and historical context, fitna refers to chaos, discord, or sedition that threatens societal harmony. By naming these insurgent groups as part of Fitna-e-Hindustan, the state is aiming to:

  1. Isolate Terror from Tribal Identity – Reinforce that the majority of Baloch people are peaceful, patriotic citizens, distinct from foreign-funded groups.

  2. Expose Foreign Involvement – Highlight India’s alleged support for Baloch militant outfits, a claim Pakistan has repeatedly brought to international forums.

  3. Unify National Discourse – Strengthen public understanding that the real enemy is not the Baloch ethnicity, but the ideology of chaos promoted through terrorism.

Impact on Narrative & Security

This rebranding comes in the wake of tragic attacks, like the recent suicide bombing on a school bus in Khuzdar, which killed children and civilians. Security officials assert that such attacks are part of a larger proxy war meant to destabilize Pakistan’s western borders — a tactic they link to India’s covert operations.

The government has also vowed to increase diplomatic efforts to internationalize this issue, pressing global powers to take action against non-state actors operating from abroad.

What’s Next?

The success of this narrative depends not just on labeling, but on actions:

  • Ensuring justice and inclusion for Baloch citizens through political empowerment and development.

  • Amplifying local voices that condemn militancy and seek peace.

  • And most importantly, protecting innocent lives from both terrorism and state excesses.

As Pakistan continues its fight against terrorism in all forms, the naming of such networks as Fitna-e-Hindustan sends a strong message:
The state will not tolerate any attempt — foreign or domestic — to divide the nation.

Before closing, in my opinion some Baloch organisations working in the name of politics and creating chaos through words or playing in the hands of enemies of Pakistan, there fate is yet to be decided.

Author

Latest Articles